• PayPal name: subiesisters@aol. com
  • Buy 'Moral Cowards' at Amazon.com

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

This is as simple as I can make it...the word 'Judean' was changed to 'Jew' in the 18th century

The word 'Jew' was inserted into the Bible about the 18th century. The 'Jew' is not who they want you to believe they are. The Jews did this to fool people into believing they are the original Israelites and 'the Chosen People.' But what they actually did was tell all of us how mean and deceptive they really are.

About eight years ago when I began my journey into 'Have Jews destroyed our nation?' there wasn't hardly any reliable information out there to answer this. The confusion for most people is that they 'think' Jews are holy people and the state of Israel belongs to them, including Jerusalem. The truth, however, is that the word 'Jew' wasn't ever in the Bible until the 18th century. That insertion cemented their existence in the minds of English-speaking people.

The King James Authorized translation of the New Testament into English was begun in 1604 and first published in 1611. The word 'Jew' did not appear in either version. The word 'Jew' appeared in both these well-known editions in their 18th century revised versions for the first time. “The word 'Jew' today is never regarded as a synonym for 'Judean' nor is 'Judean' regarded as a synonym for 'Jew.' “ http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jew.htm

When the word "Jew" was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century, its one and only implication, inference, and innuendo was "Judean." During the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries, a well-organized and well-financed international "pressure group" created a so-called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" among the English speaking peoples of the world and is a misrepresentation. http://stewartsynopsis.com/Isreal.htm
Anyone out there that reads or quotes the Bible, mixed up compilation that it is, must compare the Aramaic version with newer versions. Compare these two versions:

“However no man spoke openly of him for fear of the Jews.” John, 17:13, King James

But no man spoke openly about Him, for fear of the Judeans.” John, 17:13Aramaic is a much older translation from Greek.

And the Holman Christian Standard Bible, International Standard Version, NET Bible, GOD'S WORD Translation, Jubilee Bible 2000, King James 2000 Bible, American King James Version and countless others all excluded the word 'Judean' from their books and inserted 'Jew' in those translations.

Compare also the differences between these passages:

2, Kings 16.6 At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath: and the Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day. (King James)

6 At that time, Rezin king of Aram recovered Elath for Aram by driving out the men of Judah. Edomites then moved into Elath and have lived there to this day. (Aramaic)

2nd Kings 25:25 But it came to pass in the seventh month, that Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, the son of Elishama, of the seed royal, came, and ten men with him, and smote Gedaliah, that he died, and the Jews and the Chaldees that were with him at Mizpah. (King James)

2 Kings 25.25
25 In the seventh month, however, Ishmael son of Nethaniah, the son of Elishama, who was of royal blood, came with ten men and assassinated Gedaliah and also the men of Judah and the Babylonians who were with him at Mizpah. (Aramaic)

This kind of alteration of original writings was done to make English readers believe that Jews existed during the time of the Old Testament and Christ. They had to distinguish themselves from the other Judeans who were followers of Christ and Abraham. Once they gathered enough 'influence' and money, they had the Bible changed in the 18th century. This is a serious alteration. It takes away all the original credibility of Christ being very upset with these Judeans (that went to Babylon, the 10 Northern Tribes to Assyria) and inserts them into those roles.

In the days of His flesh few of the citizens of Judea were Judahites. Some belonged to one of the other tribes of Israel, and many were descendants of Esau (Edomites) who had assimilated and become co-religious with the Judahites and remnants of the other tribes in the hybrid religion of Pharisaism developed during the captivity in Babylon. This is the religion of the Talmud (and) is called Judaism today; it was condemned by Jesus since it is the antithesis of the Mosaic Law and the prophets makes the Word of God of no effect. Matthew 15:1-9 states such..

The issue I have with the above statement is that even Christ said there was no religion and I believe 'Pharisaism' is a recently developed word. There were 'Israelites' in Christ's time, as quoted when he met Nathanael. So, it is impossible to say Abraham was the 'first Jew.' because there were none. Hebrew was a written language for sacred books. At first the Jew spoke Yiddish, as proven when the Bolsheviks took over Mother Russia in 1917. Today any Jew will tell you he 'Is a Hebrew' and speaks Hebrew.

Jesus describes 'an Israelite' as someone who is honest. Aramaic states, “Yeshua saw Nathaniel when he came to him and said about him: “Behold, truly a son of Israel in whom is no deceit.” King James states, “Jesus saw Nathaniel coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!” Both these translations are similar but why change them at all? Because today we ARE afraid of the Jews.

I believe that the reason they inserted 'Jew' is to make people believe Jews lived in Jesus' time. There were arguments between Jesus and these 'new' Rabbis and Pharisees (Zealots) from Herod's Temple, as stated in Matthew as 'Judeans.' The mistake Jews made when taking out the word 'Judean' and inserting 'Jew' is that they have inserted the word 'Jew' onto those that were violating Temple rules not the Judeans that the people were afraid of them because if they spoke of Christ, they could not enter the Temple and some sources state these Zealots even began killing those Christ belivers. These inserters, perhaps unknowingly, made themselves the bad guys and gave them a name...Jew.  But today's 'Christians,' and even Catholics, are so scared that they will go to hell if they don't believe the Jews' story about Israel, that they won't even compare the older version of the Bible with King James.

Jews want the Bible to back up their claim that THEY were the Kingdom of Israel, which is not true, and that that claim gives them the right to stay on stolen Palestinian land. Therein lies the problem.

1 comment:

  1. I believe your facts and beliefs are spot-on, Susan. I've used a Strong's, various lexicons, Aramaic-to-English transliteration tools, early editions of the Holy Scriptures, studied as much as I could stomach of some of the Talmud volumes, studied quite a lot of world-history....and have pretty much concluded the same things you touch on here. The word Jew is a relatively new thing, it's a red herring, and the Bibles have been tampered with. I believe that we can thank C. I. Scofield and his banker backers of the time for most of it. Then we can thank the Masons and their underling plants in the various church-denominations for preaching the 'new, revised' gospel to the world's deceived sheep.

    Terrible truth. The 'end times' and 'anti-Christ' have been going on since Jesus ascended....And the Great Deception and Tribulation (the 'generation of the fig tree') are long in the tooth as well, reaching full maturity in our day. It's tempting to just crank up Soundgarden's 'Black Hole Sun' and add my own broken-hearted and weary voice to the seductive nihilist chant: Black hole sun, won't you come, and wash away the rain"....So tempting. But yet my Lord doesn't cast His people into the sea, He casts out demons and they possess those who then cast themselves into the sea.

    Much love sister, thank you for your insight. ----jimmy