• PayPal name: subiesisters@aol. com
  • Buy 'Moral Cowards' at Amazon.com

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Jewish-produced movies change true history


A funny thing happened the other day.  A friend gave me a DVD documentary entitled 'JOAN of ARC, Child of War, Soldier of God.'  The story is based on Jeanne's (Joan) own notes about her life.  About an hour later, I turned on the television and another Joan of Arc movie was on called 'The Messenger.  The story of Joan of Arc.'  There were so many differences between the two stories that they did not even seem about the same person.  Why were they different?

The documentary told of a simple farm girl from Domremy, France in 1425, not educated but quite intelligent, living through bells announcing the bombings of French villages and living a fearful life, running to the basement shelters to escape harm.  She prayed.  France was being invaded by the English, who had taken half of France.

It was prophesied in the village that a 'maiden would do wonderful things' for their nation.  Joan was living through the 100 Years War.  She prayed.

After another such a bell warning, Jeanne's family went to the shelter but she got her clothes together and left.  She had been hearing a voice inside her head tell her that she would be the one to save France from England and, in fact, she was but in the process of doing that she was betrayed by the Dauphin and imprisoned by the English and burned at the stake for witchcraft.  Five hundred years later she was canonized a saint by the very Church that condemned her to death.

Joan of Arc defended the weak heir to the throne, saying that the Dauphin was the legitimate heir, and he gave her a horse and amour.  The first battle she led the men in was successful.  So were others and France was slowly being taken back.  However, after the Dauphin's coronation, he had no need for her and felt she would get the credit for saving France, so he refused to provide her men for her army and arranged for her to be captured and given to the English.

Imprisoned in a tower, she jumped out with no injuries but was again put in a cell.  There was a trial, at which the priest tried to trick her and get her to say heresy, but she did not fall for his questions.  In the end, this valuable English prize was sentenced to be burned at the stake.

In the movie, 'The Messenger,' she was said to be violent in her fighting and frightened and mad in her captivity.  Dustin Hoffman 'appeared' to a frightened, stammering Joan as her Conscience.  When she told this apparition that she knew what the voice said was true because she had 'signs,' he mocked her.  "What kind of signs?"  She mentions the wind, or water, or a sword found in a field. 

The Conscience said, 'Oh, like people fighting in a field and someone drops their sword," and a picture of the 'event' is shown.  "Or, someone walking through the field and throws away their sword," and another picture of that is shown.  Then he says, "Or the holy version..." and a light appears coming from the sky with singing voices and in that ray of light is a sword floating to the ground.  All the while, Joan can hardly speak above a whisper, keeps moving her lips with no words and looks scared to death and certainly a crazed person who looks like a young man.

'The Messenger' doesn't speak about her courage.  It shows repeated vicious beatings of her at the hands of the guards and in the end, the English burn her at the stake. 

Let's talk about why these two stories were different.  A quote on the front of the documentary by Moviepicks states, "We wish there were more outstanding films like this, with historical accuracy and authenticity..."  The production company's name is Gaiam of GT Media.   The actors' have last names such as Vondrackova, Ward and Taylor.  The documentary was produced for 'Faith & Values Media' by Lightworks Producing Group, directed and produced by Pamela Mason Wagner.

In 'The Messenger,' it is uncertain if the actress playing Joan, Milla Jovovich, is Jewish or not but she sings for and plays in numerous movies produced by Jews.  Dustin Hoffman is Jewish.  The company producing the movie is Gaumont, which is also Columbia Pictures (Jewish-run), Tri-Star Films, Sony Picures (Jewish-run) and Universal Pictures Nordic.

Wikipedia states:  " Jovavich's Jeanne is plagued by the difference between her idea of utter submission to God and the consequences of doing so; by doubt over the veracity of her visions; and by the gap between her ideals of the divine rights of kings and realpolitik. She is constantly on the verge of a nervous breakdown - is this a manifestation of her mental illness, or of her "burning for God"? And where's the difference between the two?"

"The film raises more questions than it answers, and that's as it should be. It is something of a shame that Besson's (Jewish) film takes liberties with the facts as we understand them (though history is more often about our interpretation of events than the events themselves), but in terms of raising important questions on the nature of faith, it succeeds beyond measure."

In their own words, Jewish producers have taken 'liberties' to change the true story of Joan of Arc's courage and conviction to one of a mentally ill girl and raises 'questions' that never existed before, only to paint Joan of Arc in an insane and sarcastic light.

I have noticed other distortions with Jewish-run productions such as after 'A Bug's Life' by Pixar was produced.   'A Bug's Life' is a clean movie any child can watch.  It is about the ants uniting against the grasshoppers.  Another movie produced at the same time, 'Toy Story,' has a message of 'be kind to your toys,' and is another child-safe movie. 

After Disney (Jewish-run) bought Pixar in January of 2006, they produced 'Bee Movie,' which is rated PG for sexual content.  With 'Bee Movie,' there are too many political messages for children and of course, the sexual content.  Bee Movie is a 2007 computer animated family comedy film starring Jerry Seinfeld, Renée Zellweger, Matthew Broderick, John Goodman, Chris Rock, Kathy Bates, Barry Levinson, Megan Mullally, Rip Torn and Patrick Warburton. Produced by DreamWorks Animation, it is directed by Simon J. Smith and Steve Hickner.  Bee Movie is the first motion-picture script to be written by Seinfeld, who co-wrote it with Spike Feresten, Barry Marder, and Andy Robin. The film was produced by Jerry Seinfeld, Christina Steinberg and Cameron Stevning, according to Wikipedia.

Along the same vein, Hans Christian Andersen wrote a story called 'The Emperor's New Clothes' that depicted a vain king influenced by two weavers that pretend they are weaving invisible cloth.  In the Jewish movie version of this story by Stephen Spielberg, Yiddish phrases are used and original dialogue is changed to depict twisted and sexually-perverted minds.  Much of the voice cast is Jewish.

Why, when a wholesome story is re-produced by Jewish people it changes, I have no idea.  Why it needs to be changed is a mystery also but it happens over and over.

The change in the true Joan of Arc story is a prime example.  Jewish writers and producers either create far-out, violent, spaced-out, monster, magical or sexual movies or they take time-worn stories and change them.

At the beginning of the documentary, Leo Braudy, University of Southern California, states, "When the system has to change, when the social order itself is on the verge of changing, the vehicle of that is often a woman.  Because women are outside the social system:  Somebody who comes out of nowhere to strike against the corruption of power."

Sound familiar?


More can be read about Jewish producers, actors and movers and shakers at:  http://hipsterjew.com/2012/03/atheists-use-gods-name-in-vain-anger-yaweh/


Saturday, March 3, 2012

'Good Jewish Bitches'

 

'Good Jewish Bitches' aka GJB, is coming to your television soon.

Coming soon by any Gentile brave enough to produce it is the new show “GJB.”  The new series is based on the book “The Holocaust Adventure," by Seymour Butts, not to be confused with 'The Poseidon Adventure,' and is about a former mean white girl who moves back to her hometown in Ohio only to be the subject of gossip and backstabbing by Jewish women. 

On the GJB official website is a picture of the cover featuring a large diamond-encrusted Star of David resting on rather impressive cleavage. The picture, as yet unconfirmed, is morphed from Elizabeth's Taylor's chest.  The cover, title, and tagline make it seem as through Judaism is treated as simply an accessory to be used when it is convenient to the situation.

What is a “Good Jewish Bitch,” anyway?  I went to the GJB web site and read these probing questions:
  • Have you ever used the Torah as a neck roll while watching 'Sex in the City?'
  • Have you ever gone to a shoe store your son owns and demanded service?
  • Have you ever gone to a Jewish dating service to find out who spits on whom?
  • Have you ever mouthed your phone number to Mel Gibson as he was being interviewed for 'The Passion?'
  • Do you ever sit with men at the Synagogue dressed as a man? 
  • Do you sometimes write books about your time in German concentration camps that are not true? 
I was able to answer “no” to all of the fifteen questions and qualify as “A damn Gentile.”  Apparently, going to a Synagogue is portrayed as a lewd thing.  These are the standards to which the author holds Jewish.
This TV show suggests in its attention-getting title that being Jewish is a bad thing.  After 40 years of being told Jewish people are 'the chosen people,' no one got the memo that it wasn't true.  It is difficult to believe that such a show about any other religion would be accepted in the mainstream media.  Oh, wait.  'Good Christian Bitches' is airing Sunday, March 4th, on ABC.  I am such a dufus.

 In GJB, Jewish women are held in a high esteem for telling Gentile women off for their lop-sided version of the Bible.  I can't wait to see the outfits they are wearing.  Hey, everyone makes mistakes and no damn Gentile is going to out dress a Jewess.

The available clips of GJB mock Judaism, if anyone still considers Judaism the same as Jewism.  In one episode, a Bentley sports a decal reading, 'Who Knew?' a phrase used in promoting tourism to Israel.  A Gentile woman's Ford sports a decal reading, 'Chew the Jew' and her car is peppered with bagels and cream cheese.

How insensitive can people be?  It just isn't right that our Christian-run U.S. media can make fun of how people act!!  It is time we put down our foot and stood up for intolerance.  Oh wait, I said that wrong.  I meant, stand up for tolerance.  Don't watch 'Good Jewish Bitches.'  For that matter, don't watch 'Good Christian Bitches' either.


Monday, January 16, 2012

Before, During and After the Russian Revolution, by Susan Purtee

From Double Eagle to Red Flag...the story of communism

One insightful and strong lesson that can be learned from these three books is that Jews are used to create chaos, murder and plunder a nation and then are kicked out or murdered themselves by the leaders of the systems they helped to create. It happened in Russia under Stalin and in Germany by Hitler. History proves the same will happen to the Jews in the United States. The frightening question then becomes: Will the communist nation the Jews helped create in the United States crumble immediately or will Americans never see their America again?

It takes three strands to weave a braid and this author will weave the story of the Communistic takeover of Russia using three books: From Double Eagle To Red Flag (two volumes) by General P.N. Krassnoff, White Road by Olga Ilyin and 200 Years Together by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, a review by Wolfgang Strauss.

The first book by Krassnoff, copyright 1927, covers the twenty years or so before and up to 1917. It provides an in-depth account of all the nuances in society and government that occurred to let the 'Jew Bolsheviks,' or “Bol'sheviki yevrey” (P. 89) take over that nation that had stood for 2,000 years.

In the second book, Olga Ilyin chronicles her journey through White Russia from 1919 to 1923 as an aristocrat married to an army officer during the Russian Revolution. She also blames 'the Jews' for rousing the peasants to revolt.

Solzhenitsyn's book takes up where the other two books leave off: He tells us what happened after the Jew Bolsheviks took over.
--------------------------------------------------

From Double Eagle To Red Flag begins with the idyllic life lead by the aristocrats in Russia under Czar Nicholas II (Nikolay Alexandrovich Romanov ), a benevolent deity that saw the plight of the peasants and instituted ways to make their lives better. The aristocrats always separated their lives from the citizenry although they constantly administered to their well-being and comfort in life. In old Russia, the class lines were Tsar, nobles, merchants, clergy, professionals classes, peasants and officials.

“The 'bourgeois,' and the 'proletarians' had appeared now. Peasants and workmen still remained while all the rest were divided into parties: Monarchists, October Party, Nationalists, Constitutionalists, Social-democrats, Socialists-revolutionaries, Labour Party, Anarchists, Internationalists, Communists, --perhaps there were even more!” p. 346

The main characters in this book are Sablin Rotbek, (also called Sasha and Alexander Nicolaievitch), an officer in the Russian army who went through many women, including Marousia Lubovina, until he finally married a women in his class, Vera Constantinovna, who bore him a son named Kolia and a daughter named Tania. By Marousia he had an illegitimate son named Victor Korjikoff, who at the end of the story is responsible for his father's death.

The wife of the Czar, Alexandra, befriended a man named Rasputin, who was thought to be a mystic and plays a 'saint' paid for by Emperor Wilhelm but in reality he seduces the aristocratic women. After Vera's seduction, she commits suicide. Rasputin eventually runs away and is killed on February 28, 1917 by members of Sablin's regimen.

As socialists weaved their way into the thoughts of the aristocrats, they began to tell the people, “But now the noble class was in decay.” “Little by little they (nobles) had taken the form of the horrible, unpatriotic and superficially educated 'intelligentzia,' who were now ruining Russia in their party strife. Russia could not exist with them. Such nobles were no longer needed, let them perish and give their land to the people.” p. 346.

They also said that the clergy was in poverty and lost its active spirit and faith and had no influence on the people. The Duma was formed 'for the people' which was itself corrupt being composed of parties and not of Russian people.

Illegitimate son Victor wrote in his note-book, “Arise and stand like Israel. He shall be rewarded who succeeds in freeing himself of the enemies of Israel. He shall earn everlasting fame, who will rid himself of them and crush them.” And, “To conquer the universe? Fight unceasingly against human society until due order is established and until all the nations of the world have become your slaves.” (Bogar). “Slay the best of the gentiles, crush the head of the best serpent.” (Mechilt).

Victor had been raised by his step-father after he married the mother to 'keep her reputation' and provide for her. This husband/step-father, Fedor Fedorovitch (Korjikoff), was in the communist party, thought not a major leader. His instructions to his step-son were, “They are helping us themselves, Victor Mihaelovitch. The soldiers felt indignant, I should think. Add a drop more in one place, a stroke in another, underline the right point somewhere else and we won't be very far from a mutiny.” p. 29

Korjikoff, in teaching those following him, states, “Have you read Marx and Engles?” p. 389. “What is a government? Engels' definition is the following: 'A government is an organised form of despotism of one class over the other.' What should therefore be done, so as to free the oppressed class, i.e. the working (proletarian) class? The latter should form an organisation which would abolish the division of Society into different classes with irreconcilable and hostile interests. The abolishment of class-interests would do away with the form of coercive subjection of one class under the yoke of the other--.i. e., the government. The government would die a natural death having lost all reason for existence.” p. 390.

These Internationalists began inserting words like 'comrade' into the common language. Eventually even the Russian military began using such words. Korjikoff states, “ 'We,' said Lenin to us, 'intend to lull them to sleep by deceit. We shall amalgamate with their forces, preaching victory and at the same time leading the army to defeat.” “We shall deprive the private individuals of all their riches, placing them in the possession of the state—thus following the instruction of Marx and Engles. Not one single individual shall have the right of owning were it but a needle or a plough; everything will be socialized—and the people will become our blind weapons.” p. 393.

And indeed the Red Party did infiltrate the Russian military, spreading hopelessness and dissension among the troops, assassinating the military leaders that could have led Russia to victory and replacing them with Jews and party members. A Jew named Broadmann complains, “I'm a Jew. Yes, a Jew of that race which for centuries has been persecuted by the Russian Government” by limits of residence-license, name calling, limits in the universities, being hit. In retaliation for this treatment, he states that the same Cossacks that hit him “will obey me and will elect me honorary member of their Cossack-settlements. And girls of the best society will come to me to caress me, but I shall torment and torture them before the very eyes of their brothers and their betrothed.” p. 396.

Germany and Austria declared war on Russia. Emperors were being assassinated. Lubovin, former Russian soldier and deserter to the Red Party and brother to Marousia Lubovina (former lover of Sablin and mother to Victor) was found hanged. Sablin was wounded and later recovered, his son Kolia was killed on the battle field. by the end of Volume One.

Volume Two begins in about 1914. The Russian Revolution is being fought on two fronts, one internally with the Jews and the other on the battlefield with Germany and Austria. Jews are wearing red ribbons and giving them to the Russian soldiers. Soldiers start arresting Russian generals. Russian songs are replaced with modern, subversive ones. The Czar and his family is placed under arrest and held at Alexander Palace in Tsarskoie Selo. No one would help the Russians, not even King George and Queen Alexandra.

Meanwhile on the battlefield, the Russian military tried to maintain order not realizing they had been infiltrated by Jews and the Reds that were sabotaging and executing their ranks. The Russians won many battles against the Germans but were not getting supplies or reinforcements because their messages were not being delivered by the infiltrated revolutionaries. The army was not required to do drills any longer. The structure of the military was being destroyed. The war was being orchestrated in Sweden. “The German government has established a special branch in Sweden for the propaganda amongst the armies of the anti-German coalition, and we must use that branch for our work tending towards a universal revolution” Broadman reported to Victor, who had given valuable Russian information to Austria. “You are to go there and then to Russia, where you will promote socialistic propaganda, organize strikes, revolutionary riots, disorganize the government functionaries, and lay the foundation of civil war, disarmament and the cessation of this sanguinary war. Such is the general plan of the German government, which coincides with the program of our faction. You have been appointed leader of the 'seven' who are to act in Petrograd. You must come in touch with the following members of the Duma: Petrovsky, Badaieff, Moorakoff, Samoiloff and Shagoff.” p. 521.

Victor asks, “How are we to set to work?” and is told by Brodmann, “...the entire Russian educated classes are sure to aid you. They are a herd of cowardly sheep and it will suffice to scatter them to the ranks of the army to see it decomposed by them, as by a noxious microbe.” He is told to make a laughing stock of the officers and “to play on the public admiration of the soldier's merits and gradually form new soldiers with nothing military about them.” p. 522

One of the Czar's daughters, Tatiana Nicholaievna, and her mother worked in the tents for the injured soldiers, although many people did not trust their intentions. The emperor had abdicated his throne and there was no leadership.

In the end, Victor tried to get his father, Sablin, to go over to the Communist side and he refused. Victor threatened to take Sablin's daughter, Tania, his half-sister and rape and kill her if he did not go over to their side. After torturing and killing Sablin, Victor lined up several Russians and was going to shoot them when Victor made a mistake of asking one of the men, Polejaeff, to kill the others and gave him his gun. Polejaeff instead killed Victor and escaped with Tania to Finland across the water in a boat

---------------------------------------------------------

White Road, copyright 1984, is the true story by Ilyin of her escape from Russia to Siberia in 1919 to 1923 and then to the United States. She states on page xiv, “The First World War started in Russia in August 1914 and ended in the March 1917 Revolution. This so-called Bloodless Revolution from the Top uncovered the staggering unpreparedness of the liberal humanitarians, mostly members of the Duma, who had engineered the coup and taken over the government. The well-meaning, democratically minded Provisional Government, which we all tried to support against the Communist Party, had tied its own hands by promises of nonviolence and found itself unable to enforce its own decrees and orders.

The structure of a thousand-year-old empire swayed and crumbled under the onslaught of the Bolsheviks and their terrorist tactics. We, the intelligentsia, tried desperately and futilely to catch the shattered pieces and fit them into place, but then the bloody Red October Revolution fell upon us with its enslavement, fear, and general starvation.”

Her family was aristocracy and therefore the target of the Reds. She did not want to leave her father who was staying at Tamborsk to face certain death. She married an underground anti-Red cavalry lieutenant named Igor Volotskoy in 1917. She looked forward to fighting back against the Reds. There were several in their ranks including the Czech Legions, who were former prisoners of war and came over to the Russian side in 1916 and fought against the Germans and rebelled against the Soviets.
Many young girls were in the fighting units. Olga had just delivered her first child when the Reds were coming nearer to Tamborsk and they had to flee because her name was on the Red execution list. She began her exodus by peasant cart, next a wagon, then a Volga Steamer, a cattle car, and finally a train before reaching Siberia. The people that escaped with her shared a common bond—a frenzied hatred for Bolshevism.

By sleigh, Olga went with her baby and Pana, her nurse. She escaped death several times, hiding with relatives. “The supply of ammunition was decreasing by the hour; the Allies, disappointed in the whole venture, were no longer furnishing any war materiel and had recalled their troops. Crowds of refugees from newly abandoned territory clogged the railway, the roads, the towns. The local peasantry, most of it monarchist, was getting gloomier, less cooperative, accusing the Whites from European Russia of having dethroned the Czar, and simultaneously beginning to drift toward the greatest of magnets—the winning side.” p. 35.

At the few times she would see her husband, he said to her once when talking about whether to continue this battle, “Oh, anything which makes it easier: pleasure, excitement, oblivion. Anyway, to live full blast while it's still possible and blow one's brains out when you've had enough. When everything is going to the dogs, why deny yourself anything that might make life easier? Whatever helps one endure life must be right.” She replied, “Anything that you do to alleviate the burden is right, provided you are happy about it. I mean happy in the long run.” p. 37.

Olga went from town to town, trying to find peasants to take her in and give them food. In a discussion one night with her friends, one said, “Of course we have disappointed the Allies, but only after they dealt us this fatal blow of nonrecognition. The idiots assumed that we were fighting for the return of our possessions and privileges. In reality we have given up everything we had, to fight not only for Russia but for them also. Yes, for the whole world, its future. What about the Communist goal of world conquest? As if they had not made it clear as campaign soup! Couldn't the 'Allies see it? Oh! and buried her face in her hands.” p. 50.

In 1905, there was a “revolution that granted so many new freedoms to the people, we saw Russia make powerful strides in so many fields. Mental and material freedom, formerly the prerogative of the privileged class, had been broadening fast before our eyes; economic, cultural, and educational advancement, the adoration of poetry, music, the theater, overflowing into all the nooks and crannies of Russian daily life, created an atmosphere of uplifting purposefulness. To stop the process of dehumanization started by the Bolsheviks was, we felt, our duty and privilege.” p. 68.

The Reds screamed their slogans, “All Land to the Peasants! All Power to the Workers and Soldiers!' and especially 'Death to Your Exploiter! Grab all you want, it's rightfully yours!' All this would seem to have doomed us to failure from the beginning. But we did not believe so.” p. 69.

Leaflets were circulating telling people to destroy the Southern (White) Army and then add “to rise to the defense of our abused Mother Russia” which was odd since “Bolsheviks never referred to Russia otherwise than as 'the Soviet Union.' “ The Reds would also say Grand Duke Nikolay Nikolaevich has been chosen and “Lenin and Trostsky in Moscow have given their allegiance to the Grand Duke and have been appointed his ministers. I am calling upon each and every orthodox Christian to take up arms with me for the Czar and the Soviets.” Olga's husband replied upon reading this, “Clever so-and-sos. These days the more blatant the lie, the better they will swallow it.” p. 99.

The small group went from village to village in search of a place to stay and some food. Olga's little son got sick from lack of milk and bottles were hard to obtain. Another friend of her husband's named Verin was told to stay with the women. He states, “My cousin insisted that I stay here where I could still serve my country. Men of goodwill were needed desperately to counteract the other kind—sadists and criminals who had pushed into the ranks of the Bolsheviks.” p. 194.

Their lives were miserable and no one from the outside would help the Russians. “Every Red official, no matter how low in status, was a power with regard to a conquered White.” p. 204. People were released from prison on condition that they would inform on those around them. They asked how someone could eavesdrop on their friends and they said, “Well the poor man sat for twenty-four hours in the ice chamber and discovered he could.” p. 204

Olga asked one of the people she knew why he was working on the Red's automobiles and said to him, “Did it never occur to you that if nobody listened to these spies and propagandists the Whites could have won?” He replied, “Not a chance. I'm telling you we had no real leader to unite us. This man said to us: 'You're fighting with windmills like Don Juan, that's what you're doing.' “ p. 213.

Olga managed to get back to her home city, Tamborsk, at great risk and stayed with her baby at an aunt's home. She found out that people she knew who had been jealous of them had turned to the Red side. The Peasants from Sinniy Bor would “complain bitterly to her about the losses and offenses they had suffered at the hands of the village commissars and even the young generation of Communist-propagandized hoodlums—their own children.” p. 243. No country helped them and “the only people still interested in the anti-Communist struggle in Siberia were the Japanese, and they had put their support behind Ataman Semenov.” p. 244.

Finally in Harbin, she meets up with her husband who holds her and his son and states, “Fine then! Let's head for America!” p. 316.

So ends this story, coming to America in early 1920s and settling San Francisco.

---------------------------------------------------------

The third book in this Russian trilogy is 200 Years Together. I am at a slight disadvantage because I have not read the recent English translations because it seems each chapter was translated by a different person and I can't rely on its correctness, so I must rely on Wolfgang Strauss' earlier article about the book, 'The End of the Legends' in 2005.

Solzhenitsyn published this two-volume work on the history of Russian-Jewish relations (Two Hundred Years Together 2001, 2002). This book stirred controversy and caused Solzhenitsyn to be widely accused of anti-Semitism.

It is interesting that when restrictions were in place on Jews in Russia, the nation had survived for hundreds of years in relative peace and harmony. Once the leaders started giving in 'to equal rights' for the Jews and peasants, the old nation was torn apart, its leaders, clergy and military murdered, and millions of Russians, including Ukrainians, died. The common thread in these three books is the introduction of Liberalism/Socialism before Communism.

In Wolfgang Strauss' review of Solzhenitsyn's book, he states, “Solzhenitsyn emphasizes, "Many more Jewish voices than Russian are heard in this book". Jewish voices, not Russian, speak of Jewish dominance in the anti-monarchial movements in the period before the war. In an article entitled "The Jewish Revolution" in the 10 December 1919 issue of the Neue Jüdischen Monatsheften, published in Berlin, was the sentence:
"Regardless of how extremely the anti-Semites exaggerate it, and how so nervously the Jewish bourgeoisie deny it, the large Jewish contingent in today’s revolutionary movement stands fast."
After incarceration in 1945 and release during the 50s, he converted to Russian Orthodox and changed his first name from Aleksandr to Alexander. He followed Marxism before his conversion in 1954 and had served in the Red Army.

200 Years Together began in 1964 as an article on Russia and the Jews. After Petr Stolypin was murdered in 1911 in the Kiev Opera, Solzhenitsyn wrote, “The first Russian premier minister, who had honorably set the task of establishing equal rights for Jews and had even opposed the Tsar in attempting to realize it, was killed at the hands of a Jew. Was it an irony of history?” Solzhenitsyn does assert that the assassin, Mordko Hershovich Bogrov, was an agent of the Okhrana, a spy in the pay of the Tsarist secret police. Wouldn't this incident be similar to the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin in 1992 by a “right-wing Israeli radical Yigal Amir”?

Strauss states in defense of Solzhenitsyn being accused of “anti-Semitism” that he defended
Stolypin, “Every truth lives within a time nucleus. The truth about the 'October Revolution' in which the Bogrovs, Bronsteins, Mandelstams, Auerbachs, Rosenfelds, Brilliants, and Apfelbaums played an essential role, is being vomited up ten years after the end of the failed experiment of Communism.”

Solzhenitsyn cites 1918 as the date Red Terror was born. A terrorist named Apfelbaum proclaimed the mass death sentence: “The bourgeoisie can kill some individuals, but we can murder whole classes of people.” And Sonia Margolina, the daughter of a Jewish Trotskyite and proud of it, accuses Solzhenitsyn of 'always looking backwards.'

In 1918, “the non-communist intelligentsia saw Medusa's head.” Apfelbaum, who entered the history books as Zinovev, wanted to send ten million Russians to the smoldering ovens of the class war. He stated, “From the population of a hundred million in Soviet Russia, we must win over ninety million to our side. We have nothing to say to the others. They have to be exterminated.”

Solzhenitsyn cites the Israeli historian Aron Abramovitch who in 1982 in Tel Aviv wrote: “In October 1917 the Jewish contingent of soldiers played a decisive role in the preparation and execution of the armed Bolshevik uprising in Petrograd and other cities as well as in the following battles in the course of suppressing rebellions against the new Soviet power.”
The writer Nashivin notes that he isn't anti-Semite but that “the mass of Jews in the Kremlin literally knocks your eyes out.” Vladimir Korolenko, who was close to the Social Democrats, in 1919 stated, “There are many Jews and Jewesses among the Bolsheviks. Their main characteristics—self-righteousness, aggressive tactlessness and presumptive arrogance—are painfully evident. Bolshevism is found contemptible in the Ukraine. The preponderance of Jewish physiognomies, especially in the Cheka (secret police), evokes an extremely virulent hatred of Jews among the people.”

Solzhenitsyn states, “Whoever holds the opinion that the revolution was not a Russian, but an alien-led revolution points to the Yiddish family names or pseudonyms to exonerate the Russian people for the revolution. On the other hand, those who try to minimize the over-proportional representation of Jews in the Bolshevik seizure of power may sometimes claim that they were not religious Jews, but rather, apostates, renegades, and atheists.”

Lenin provided the impetus. On July 27, 1918, after the murder of the Tsar and his family, the Soviet government ordered the liquidation of all pogromists and every priest was by law considered to be a pogromist. For this destruction and extermination, Sverdlov, Dzerzhinski and Trotsky were the most power allies. None of them was Russian. The executioners in Yekaterinburg and Ural governments were not Russians. Yankel Yurovsky, not a Russian, boasted, “It was my revolver that knocked off Nicholas on the spot.” The victims were overwhelming Russians, millions of Russians. Those shot in cellars, burnt to death in the cloisters, drown in river boats, hanged in the forest; officers, peasants, aristocrats, proletariats, the anti-anti-Semitic bourgeois intellectuals—Russians mostly.

Solzhenitsyn emphasizes, the Cheka-Lubyanka-Gulag holocaustic perpetrators could not possibly be a Slavic people (p. 93). On page 233 of Nolte's Der Kausale Nexus, the German historian is convinced the term “Jewish Bolshevism” is historically well-founded and should not be expunged from history.
Solzhenitsyn writes that without the high Jewish presence among the leaders and executioners of the Bolshevik dictatorship, Lenin's newly born Soviet state would have been at an end, at the latest, by the time of the Kronstadt Sailors Rebellion in 1921.

While there was a rise during this time of anti-Semitism because of what was happening in Russia, and the Soviet Union fell in the late 1980s, there was no retaliation against Jewry as many in 1939 had predicted. “Solzhenitsyn cites extensively and without commentary from newspapers of the day. According to the newspapers, the 'Jew Bolsheviks' had captured and occupied the Soviet State; they were in the top ranks of the Red Army. Soviet power had been converted into Jewish power, and the Jews pursued Jewish, not Russian goals.“ (p. 201). Even Jews said, “Judeophobia has spread throughout present-day Russia.” Such slogans appeared on the walls of high schools--'Smash the Jews, Save the Soviets'; 'Beat the Jews Up, Save the Councils.'

With all the frenzy about the Jews, Russian revolutionaries Frunze, Nogin and Troyanovsky called for the expulsion of the 'Jewish leaders' from the Politburo upon which, opponents of this idea reacted quickly and Nogin died and later Frunze. (p. 209).

Stalin deliberately placed Jews in leading positions so that later he would have plausible grounds for turning them over to the executioner on grievous charges. A program from 1928 – 1933 had names of prominent 'Jew Bolsheviks' attached. Jews spread terror, killing peasants and destroying the villages, leading to the famine that took the lives of at least six million Ukrainians. In 1936, after the slaughter of the peasantry, “at the hands of the Bolshevik Jews,” the death bell began to toll for those who had been responsible for the carnage. Names like Ya. Yakovlev-Epstein, M. Kolmanovich, G. Roschal, V. Feygin. (p. 285).

Even with the purging of the murderous Jews, Solzhenitsyn states, “Cadaver-like obedience in the GPU, the Red Army, the diplomatic service, and on the ideological front. The passionate participation of young Jews in these branches was in no way dampened by the bloody events of 1936-38.” (p. 281).

Jews had controlled food, businesses and the torture institutions. Commissioned by the NKVD, the Jewish designer of execution systems, Grigori Mayranovsky, invested the gas chair. The mobile gassing truck was invested by Isay Davidovich Berg, head of the NKVD Economics Division in the Moscow region. (p. 297).

CONCLUSION

From Double Eagle To Red Flag by General P.N. Krassnoff, was written by a man that lived it. Although he describes events that happened to him, he also pieces together the stories told to him by other Russians that lived through this time.

Krassnoff takes the reader through the twenty years or so before Communism took over in 1917 and describes a beautiful life by the aristocracy of manners, nobleness, honor and culture of the arts. It is mindful of the beautiful days before the Civil War when the cultured people wore beautiful clothes, cared for their plantations and never thought of death much. It also tells of promiscuity among the wealthy and a mutual blindness among their ranks that their lives would ever change because of giving peasants 'more rights.' Those in the military 'noticed' the abundance of Jews among them but never thought to deny them being in their ranks.

But the Communists, guided by Karl Marx's 'Communist Manifesto,' used the plan to 'free the workers' to actually put into place a revengeful plan to pay people back for the 'wrongs done to the Jews.'

The socialists, little by little, told the Tsar that he needed to give peasants more rights, which he did. At the same time, however, those socialists, aka Communist Jews, began undermining Russian society with propaganda about destroying the aristocrats because they were depriving them of freedom. The propaganda fed into the resentment of the peasants that they did not have the beautiful lives the rich did and that this new-found Communism would give them that life “because they deserved it.”

Krassnoff describes the violence and debauchery of those Jews in the Gulag and the stupidity of the people that thought their new life would be so much better than under the Tsar. It was not.
White Road by Olga Ilyin, is the true story of one aristocratic White European Russian family's escape from Russia to Siberia and then to America. It chronicles how difficult and how dangerous that journey was and how easily the peasants turned on them, blamed them and felt no compassion for them.

Olga only slightly mentions the death of the Tsar and never the Communist Manifesto. She realizes Russia is dying and describes the tragedy happening to her family and the cruelty and fear but never puts the blame squarely on the Communists.

200 Years Together by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, shows how deadly Communism is and its aftermath in Russia. Although Stalin would execute those Jews in high places, the Soviet Union and Communism was by 1918 cemented in place.

This hate of a particular ethnic-religious group may be the reason the second volume of Two Hundred Years Together is available for reading in full in Putin's Russia but not in Germany. “To fight Fascism, you have to be a Communist” according to a BBC story about the Cambridge Spy case. So Jews and Russians fought against Germany and Hitler. Solzhenitsyn says that Lenin chose these young Jews because of “their deadly hate they had for the Russian traditions, religious rites, historical models, hate for everything Russian and Russia itself. Second, their willingness to cross the last taboo borders in morality. Third, their readiness to physically liquidate the enemy.”

Lenin, the internationalist, was no friend of Jews who were Zionists believing Jews were a “paper nation.” Six and a half times more Jews occupied cadre positions in the Soviet ruling class than existed in the total Jewish population, which was 1.82% in 1926.

In the 1920s, Jewish internationalists purged the history books by deleating and forbidding such concepts as 'Russian history' and 'Great Russia. Germans purged the derussification program conducted by the 'Jew Bolsheviks' during the 1920s nor do the terms Cheka and GPU appear in the German reviews. “The purges resulted in the physical disappearance of almost all Jewish Communists who played an important role in the USSR.” p. 327.

Stalin thought Jews could be assimilated but Jews fiercely rejected assimilation. Yiddish was promoted as the Jewish Soviet Nation language in 1920 but was abandoned with the triumph of an international atheism.

Solzhenitsyn questions why the reality of the Gulag is much less remembered than the persecution of the Jews under National Socialism.

It has always amazed me that the Crusades killed people 'in the name of God' or that the very points the Communists stated at the beginning they were against were the very same things they did when they took power except much more violent and horrible. And the 'extermination' today's Jews say happened to them in German concentration camps was already being done in Russia to the Russian people from 1917, the main difference being there is no knowledge that Hitler did anything perverted or sadistic to his prisoners. David Irving has stated that Jews sent to Russia from Germany during this time just 'vanished.' Jews killing Jews?

It seems to me that when the United States entered WWI, they allowed the Communist victory over Russia and domination over Germany, the nation that was anti-communist along with Franco of Spain and Mussolini of Italy. In other words, the United States preferred Communism to anti-Communism.

Coincidence or fact? Even with the 60s Revolution in the United States, Jewish professors like Robert Weissberg of American Renaissance states in his writings that it was a Jewish-run movement, paid for by Jews running the NAACP and other organizations that were supposed to be for American blacks and fought for in courts by over 50% Jewish attorneys. But Weissberg stated that he told the American people this not so they would know who did it, but because the 'Jews are upset that the blacks don't appreciate what they have done for them.'

Plain and simple: Communism was thought up by Karl Marx, born Jewish, and it was implemented in Russia by Jews. They may not have been 100% of the Gulag or Cheka or in the military but they were the orchestrators of the Revolution. The Bolshevisks murdered priests, bishops (especially the village clergy) and exterminated the nobility and the Tsar and his family, according to Solzhenitsyn, and from 1918 to 1920, the secret police (Cheka) was controlled by Bolshevistic Jews.

In reading these three stories I can see that what happened to Russia is happening to the United States today. It began with Socialism by FDR, Liberalism in the Democratic Party and in colleges and universities. The Non-Government Organizations taking our industries overseas and groups like the anti-Defamation League purging our society of anything Catholic or Christian is, in my opinion, a deliberate destruction of our nation by Communists.

Senator Joseph McCarthy was the last anti-Communist man in America. He recognized the “Jewish-Soviet spies” in our Federal government and eliminated them. He also banned Jewish filmmakers from making subversive and perverted films until 1965. That is when the 60s Revolution began, our own Russian Revolution, that ushered in slogans like 'Down with the Establishment,' drugs and free love.

But the Jews had already been working behind the scenes with desegregation and Civil Rights and bloating the Welfare State. They control American media, which controls the American mind. They are disproportionately represented in government, the same tactics used to take over Russia.

Yet we, as with Russia, are afraid to identify the enemy until it is too late.

Sunday, December 25, 2011

Coming Soon..........

The Columbus Crier has a couple of articles coming up you will enjoy.  The first is an article on Milosevic.  The next is a book review of 'White Road' by Olga Ilyin and the third is a book review of 'From Double Eagle to Red Flag' by General P.N. Krassnoff.

I found 'White Road' in a book club in the 70s.   You won't find 'From Double Eagle to Red Flag' because Jews in America had it banned but you can buy it on the internet for a thousand dollars.

See you in January!!
Susie

Just a Thought......

I listened to the below video about the Constitution and thought how insane our 'government' has become because of WHO is running it.  

On television Dec. 24, I heard some newsman say that 25% of all lung cancer victims are people that never smoked.  They said this must be 'because of some gene.'  LOL

So that means the other 75% don't have this gene?  lol


Then I thought about how persecuted smokers are by banishing them to the cold, snow and rain 'to keep people healthy.'   How kids are taught in school how creepy cigarette smoking is.


Homosexuals are the dominant group with AIDS and HIV.  Are they persecuted?  Are they banished to the far corners of society for their awful deed?  

Are obese people banished because they cause a severe strain on our 'health care' system?  Because these fat people develop diabetes, heart disease, circulation problems AND are loaded up with drugs so they can develop other diseases such as Lymphoma??


Listen to the judge:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=7n2m-X7OIuY 
Judge Andrew Napolitano on 'Health care' and the Constitution.

Saturday, November 5, 2011

Why are people MEAN?

I just read an article by Martha Beck from a 2003 Oprah magazine about why people are mean and it was pretty good. She said that the short answer is: They're hurt. The long answer is: They're really hurt.

She states that “at some point, somebody—their parents, their lovers, Lady Luck—did them dirty. They were crushed. And they're still afraid the pain will never stop, or that it will happen again.” I believe that is correct and also believe that interpreting these events in childhood as attacks against you also prevents the brain from making the correct connections, thereby also producing Manic Depressives, aka Bi Polar, people. By the age of ten, the brain is pretty much hard-wired and you're stuck with what you think.

Why does Martha say these people continue to whine? Because “...trapped in a tale of victimization and helplessness, they feel perfectly justified in venting their anger cruelly, using violence or deceit to feel less vulnerable, and striking at other before they can be struck.”

I find that mean people come in all kinds of wrappings. They may be leaders of nations such as Ben Netanyahu, who has no problem stealing Palestinian land, not having his soldiers be responsible for killing Palestinians and for stating that American people are stupid and must support Israel.

Now, we come upon an interesting observation. Why are Israelis mean? Yes, they tried to bomb the King David Hotel and blame the Egypt but got caught. They bombed the USS Liberty in 1967 in unmarked planes because they didn't want that spy ship knowing they wanted to take the Golan Heights in Syria. Jews brag in their web sites that they know how to 'buy' Palestinian land deceitfully. Do Jews think, as Martha Beck states, that they are “trapped in a tale of victimization and helplessness?”

The author believes that the only way for a mean person to get off the merry-go-round of feeding their own actions is for them to 're-write' their story in a manner which gives them power again asking themselves such questions as, “Do you dwell on vengeance or gratitude? Do difficult people and situations appear as forces who control you or as problems you are busily solving?”

Now, this is all well and good if you believe that mean people can change or see themselves objectively. I think they cannot. So my solution is to protect the person that is being attacked by meanness.

One tactic you can use against a mean person is silence. Just because someone asks you a stupid or hurtful question does NOT mean you must answer it. It does NOT mean you have to go into a litany of reasons why you are not guilty. Just say nothing.

And there is nothing wrong with telling the hurtful person that you are not talking to them again because they have nothing useful to say. This is not mean...it is honest. But make sure you do NOT talk to them again. You are not playing their games. You are taking your marbles and going home.

What do you say to your beautiful granddaughter that has been hurt by cruel and intimidating comments from other girls? You say that she is absolutely correct, that those girls are trying to hurt her but all they are doing is making threats and if she believes them, she will be hurt. You also tell her she is probably too young to understand that the best answer is to not say anything and just turn and walk away...to be the GROWN UP in the situation.

Recognize that sometimes a hurtful remark is also done with words like 'sweetheart' and seems to be concerned for you. Your best instinct is your first reaction to the comment. If you feel hurt or oppressed, don't lose that feeling! Take control.....decide if you want to reply to their meanness or just walk away. Whatever makes you feel better.

As far as mean world leaders go, the only defense you have is to speak the truth about what they are doing, maybe even being brave enough to write a book or a letter to the editor of your newspaper about them.

Mean people are mentally sick and a confident person is usually their target so it is important as a parent that we are fair and kind to our children while they are young. Insulting them or hurting them or not loving them can injure them for life.

Communism--The Prodigal Son—the Trojan Horse

In this paper, I will compare and contrast Karl Marx and Frederick Engels' small “complete theoretical and practical party program,” the Communist Manifesto, with Olga Ilyin's true story, White Road, A Russian Odyssey. Olga does not mention Karl Marx nor the death of the Czar and his family in her book White Road. The purpose of this paper is to clearly identify the philosophy, tactics and propaganda that Communism uses since its creation in 1848, ironically 100 years before the State of Israel was given Palestinian land. There is no communism in Israel.

I will be brief as possible and paraphrase large quotes and excerpts because of the short-reading span of non-Communists. Olga's book encapsulates her escape from Russia after the Reds took over and covers 1919 to 1923, when she was finally reunited with her White Army husband-colonel, Igor Volotskoy in Harbin and fled to the United States.

Russia was ripe for the Bolsheviks to conquer. But this is not a history of the Russian Revolution, for there are those more fluent in that story than I. This paper takes the reader step-by-step into how Communism works and how it is working in America today, using the same time-worn tactics of the Communist Manifesto.

The first similarity I noticed between today and 1917 is the constant use of the phrase “White Russians” and “European White Russians.” It seems that Communists have a vendetta against whatever “white” or “European” represents. Before Civil Rights, Americans did not describe themselves by race because assimilation means that all races melt into one American society. Our penny states, E pluribus unum, Latin for "Out of many, one" By creating a 'race war,' the United States has become the same victim as the 'White Russians,” who did not give themselves that title either.

Although Marx calls the Establishment “aristocracy” and “bourgeoisie” in his pamphlet, it is the same thing: Those people with wealth that create a Produce and Sell economy, which is called Capitalism in the United States. Marx preys on the complaints of the workers in these industries/businesses. He takes these 'oppression' complaints and manipulates the peasant's minds into believing that without the wealthy owning these industries, they would be FREE. He neglects to say that the State is a major oppressor.

In 1905, Russia had a weakly-run government and a quite idealistic wealthy aristocratic citizenry who believed, as white South Africans did, that they provided economic stability to the nation and it was their duty to help the peasants or blacks or whatever other human-suffering group needed it. It did not occur to the White Russians, as it did not occur to the Americans, that helping the uneducated poor or the peasants or a minority by bloating the Welfare State or creating Affirmative Action or Busing was communism. The non-poor felt compassion for the oppressed that they were being told by Jewish-run institutions and the media needed to be lifted up to the same level as the middle-class, at least in looks.

Why were the same slogans used to take over Russia, i.e. 'Down with the Aristocrats,' echoed forty-six years later in America during the 60's Revolution with 'Down with the Establishment?' Because they are the same animal...Communism.

"But why did we fail? What had destroyed us? We could have won! We had come so close to winning last spring when our army had practically approached the Volga, and when it was at the very gates of Tamborsk,” the White Russians said to themselves.

"We knew that we were fighting against tremendous odds; that our Volunteer Armies, all three of them--the Southern on the Don, the small Northern one, and our Eastern People's Army under Admiral Kolchak--were just thin strings stretched around the immensity of Communist-held Russia. We knew that we were cut off from Russian war industry, indeed from industry in general; we knew that the slogans we were presenting to the masses--such as 'Constitute Assembly, Democracy! Free Elections!'--were incomprehensible, empty sounds to them, while those proclaimed by the Red side screamed their meaning with intoxicating clarity" 'All Land to the Peasants! All Power to the Workers and Soldiers!' and especially 'Death to Your Exploiters! Grab all you want, it's rightfully yours!' All this would seem to have doomed us to failure from the beginning. But we did not believe so. We had been certain all along that the sheer dedication of our fighting units and the hatred felt for the Bolsheviks in areas that had already experienced their rule were factors powerful enough for us to win in the end." (Ilyin , p. 68-69)

The Manifesto was published as the platform of the Communist League, a workingmen's association, first exclusively German and later on international. Unavoidably it was a secret society (Marx, p. 3). In 1852 at the Cologne Communist Trial by Prussians, members of the Communist League were sentenced to prison because it had grown too strong and the League dissolved. The Manifesto seemed doomed to oblivion. (Marx, p. 4)

But this 'workingman's association idea continued to grow, promoted by Jews to the peasants, according to Olga. Once the Bolsheviks took over most of Russia, all they needed to do was put fear into the hearts of the weak that were only too happy to tattle on their neighbor and win favor with the new government. Communism is a working class movement.

In America, however, Communism has no 'working class' to win over to their side. What they do have through Jewish-creation in the last 50 years, is a huge Welfare State, an economic crisis, a lack of well-paying jobs, professional jobs filled by foreigners and no entrepreneurial possibilities because of overwhelming employer taxes.

Russia of the early 1900s had no industry to speak of. It was mostly agricultural. Peasants worked in the fields and lived in modest homes. Many peasants, thanks to encouragement from White Russians, were becoming 'wealthy' in their own right. The contradiction with Communism is that it states capitalism produces work plus more workers and that is called 'oppression.' This is similar to those Jewish-run organizations telling the American blacks that they were slaves and that somehow, hundreds of years later, that is a bad thing and 'whites are the cause of your oppression.' Quite clever.

“Nothing is easier than to give Christians asceticism a Socialist tinge. Has not Christianity declaimed against private property, against marriage, against the state? Has it not preached in the place of these, charity and poverty, celibacy and mortification of the flesh, monastic life and Mother Church? Christian Socialism is but the holy water with which the priest consecrates the heart-burnings of the aristocrat.” (Marx p. 33)

“The bourgeoisie naturally conceives the world in which it is supreme to be the best; and bourgeois Socialism develops this comfortable conception into various more or less complete systems. In requiring the proletariat to carry out such a system, and thereby to march straightway into the social New Jerusalem, it but requires in reality, that the proletariat should remain within the bounds of existing society, but should cast away all its hateful ideas concerning the bourgeoisie.” (Marx p. 38) Is Marx talking about the Jews in the French, German and Prussian societies? Are these Jews the ones that want to cast off the robes of oppression by using the peasants as they did the American blacks in the 1960s Revolution?

Communism is a creation of Karl Marx, a Jew. Professor Robert Weissberg, a Jew, stated to me in 2000 that the Civil Rights movement was run by Jews and those institutions such as the NAACP. In a paper he wrote called, 'Jews and Blacks: Everything the Goyim Want to Know But Are Afraid to Ask,' he states that over 50% of the attorneys during the Civil Rights and desegregation movement were Jewish and that “The Julius Rosenwald Foudation virtually single-handedly bankrolled the NAACP's Legal Defense Fund.” He named all the institutions Jews have created such as the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League. Weissberg's philosophy is Communist.

I want you to research who owns/runs our newspapers, movie-making industry, magazines, book publishing companies, comic books, Disney, Pixar, T.V. Shows...and you will find a changing of the guard since the late 1960s. Research how many Jewish advisers the president has in his cabinet. I refuse to call any cult, any anti-Republic group, any idealistic group whose purpose it is to rule the world....a race. That is NOT a race. It is communism and the United States' people fell for it just as the White Russians did. They were destroyed by their politeness.

Who were the 'Aristocracy?' There were the old-money wealthy. 'Who were these 'Bolsheviks?' The Bolsheviks were merchants that became wealthy but were never accepted into the old-money society. If the 'working class' is the most suffering class, what then are the Welfare Class now created in America? In other words, there are no peasants or working class in America any longer so Communism attacks the whole infrastructure of the United States...”Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes,” “A heavy progressive or graduated income tax” and “Abolition of all right of inheritance.” (Marx, p. 30) The modern laborer “becomes a pauper, and pauperism develops more rapidly than population and wealth” (Marx, p. 21)

Communism promotes the abolition of the distinction between town and country; abolition of the family, of private gain, and of the wage-system; the proclamation of social harmony; the conversion of the functions of the state into a mere superintendence of production...” (Marx, p. 41)

In France, according to Marx, the Communists ally themselves with the Social-Democrats. In Switzerland they support the Radicals. In Poland they support the party that insists on an agrarian revolution as the prime condition for national emancipation, that party which fomented the insurrection of Cracow in 1846. (Marx, p. 43)

Marx states that in Germany they fight with the bourgeoisie whenever it acts in a revolutionary way, against the absolute monarchy, the feudal squirearchy (sic), and the petty bourgeoisie. The Communists turn their attention chiefly to Germany, because that country was on the eve of a bourgeois revolution that is bound to be carried out under more advanced conditions of European civilization and with a much more developed proletariat than what existed in England in the 17th and in France in the 18th century, and because the bourgeois revolution in Germany will be but the prelude to an immediately following proletarian revolution. (Marx, p. 44) Adolf Hitler was anti-communist.

Marx takes all the things the peasants were aware of--professors, country squires and officials--and created a struggle in Germany between the poorer existence of the peasants and blamed it on the aristocrats that created the work. (Marx p. 37) Today, because of the efforts of certain Jews to free the blacks from oppression, our society has become a service-based economy, a welfare recipient of all things such as Food Stamps and unemployment, low-paying jobs—credit dependent society, and now dependent upon the government for Health Care, which is socialized medicine. Our industries and jobs are in foreign countries, the Jewish-run banks are taking our homes, our government encourages illegals and foreigners to suck off our taxes by enabling them with the H1B visa and NAFTA visa.

Communism is an evil, selfish, deceptive philosophy created to empower those that created it—the Jews—in the name of freedom from oppression. It is rewarding the Prodigal Son; of accepting the Trojan Horse into their mist while not thinking to look inside. Yet Communism still exists today because of unaware and ignorant citizens that do not recognize it when cloaked in 'rights for the minorities.' While the concept might be pure, the implementation is impossible. People need rewards and responsibility, safety and individualism—exactly what the United States had before the 60s Revolution.

The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communist revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workingmen of all countries, unite!