A funny thing happened the
other day. A friend gave me a DVD
documentary entitled 'JOAN of ARC, Child of War, Soldier of God.' The story is based on Jeanne's (Joan) own
notes about her life. About an hour
later, I turned on the television and another Joan of Arc movie was on called
'The Messenger. The story of Joan of
Arc.' There were so many differences
between the two stories that they did not even seem about the same person. Why were they different?
The documentary told of a
simple farm girl from Domremy, France in 1425, not educated but quite intelligent,
living through bells announcing the bombings of French villages and living a
fearful life, running to the basement shelters to escape harm. She prayed.
France was being
invaded by the English, who had taken half of France.
It was prophesied in the
village that a 'maiden would do wonderful things' for their nation. Joan was living through the 100 Years
War. She prayed.
After another such a bell warning,
Jeanne's family went to the shelter but she got her clothes together and
left. She had been hearing a voice
inside her head tell her that she would be the one to save France from England and, in fact, she was but in
the process of doing that she was betrayed by the Dauphin and imprisoned by the
English and burned at the stake for witchcraft.
Five hundred years later she was canonized a saint by the very Church
that condemned her to death.
Joan of Arc defended the weak
heir to the throne, saying that the Dauphin was the legitimate heir, and he
gave her a horse and amour. The first
battle she led the men in was successful.
So were others and France
was slowly being taken back. However,
after the Dauphin's coronation, he had no need for her and felt she would get
the credit for saving France,
so he refused to provide her men for her army and arranged for her to be
captured and given to the English.
Imprisoned in a tower, she
jumped out with no injuries but was again put in a cell. There was a trial, at which the priest tried
to trick her and get her to say heresy, but she did not fall for his
questions. In the end, this valuable
English prize was sentenced to be burned at the stake.
In the movie, 'The
Messenger,' she was said to be violent in her fighting and frightened and mad
in her captivity. Dustin Hoffman
'appeared' to a frightened, stammering Joan as her Conscience. When she told this apparition that she knew
what the voice said was true because she had 'signs,' he mocked her. "What kind of signs?" She mentions the wind, or water, or a sword found
in a field.
The Conscience said, 'Oh,
like people fighting in a field and someone drops their sword," and a
picture of the 'event' is shown.
"Or, someone walking through the field and throws away their
sword," and another picture of that is shown. Then he says, "Or the holy
version..." and a light appears coming from the sky with singing voices and in that ray of
light is a sword floating to the ground.
All the while, Joan can hardly speak above a whisper, keeps moving her
lips with no words and looks scared to death and certainly a crazed person who looks like a young man.
'The Messenger' doesn't speak
about her courage. It shows repeated
vicious beatings of her at the hands of the guards and in the end, the English burn
her at the stake.
Let's talk about why these
two stories were different. A quote on
the front of the documentary by Moviepicks states, "We wish there were
more outstanding films like this, with historical accuracy and
authenticity..." The production
company's name is Gaiam of GT Media. The
actors' have last names such as Vondrackova, Ward and Taylor. The documentary was produced for 'Faith &
Values Media' by Lightworks Producing Group, directed and produced by Pamela
Mason Wagner.
In 'The Messenger,' it is
uncertain if the actress playing Joan, Milla Jovovich, is Jewish or not but she
sings for and plays in numerous movies produced by Jews. Dustin Hoffman is Jewish. The company producing the movie is Gaumont,
which is also Columbia Pictures (Jewish-run), Tri-Star Films, Sony Picures
(Jewish-run) and Universal Pictures Nordic.
Wikipedia states: " Jovavich's Jeanne is plagued by
the difference between her idea of utter submission to God and the consequences
of doing so; by doubt over the veracity of her visions; and by the gap between
her ideals of the divine rights of kings and realpolitik. She is constantly on
the verge of a nervous breakdown - is this a manifestation of her mental
illness, or of her "burning for God"? And where's the difference
between the two?"
"The film raises more questions than it answers, and that's
as it should be. It is something of a shame that Besson's (Jewish) film takes
liberties with the facts as we understand them (though history is more often
about our interpretation of events than the events themselves), but in terms of
raising important questions on the nature of faith, it succeeds beyond
measure."
In their own words, Jewish
producers have taken 'liberties' to change the true story of Joan of Arc's
courage and conviction to one of a mentally ill girl and raises 'questions'
that never existed before, only to paint Joan of Arc in an insane and sarcastic
light.
I have noticed other
distortions with Jewish-run productions such as after 'A Bug's Life' by Pixar
was produced. 'A Bug's Life' is a clean movie any child can
watch. It is about the ants uniting
against the grasshoppers. Another movie
produced at the same time, 'Toy Story,' has a message of 'be kind to your toys,'
and is another child-safe movie.
After Disney (Jewish-run)
bought Pixar in January of 2006, they produced 'Bee Movie,' which is rated PG
for sexual content. With 'Bee Movie,'
there are too many political messages for children and of course, the sexual
content. Bee Movie
is a 2007 computer animated family comedy film
starring Jerry Seinfeld, Renée
Zellweger, Matthew Broderick, John
Goodman, Chris Rock, Kathy Bates,
Barry
Levinson, Megan Mullally, Rip Torn and Patrick
Warburton. Produced by DreamWorks Animation, it is directed by Simon
J. Smith and Steve Hickner. Bee Movie
is the first motion-picture script to be written by Seinfeld, who co-wrote it
with Spike Feresten, Barry Marder, and Andy Robin.
The film was produced by Jerry Seinfeld, Christina Steinberg and Cameron
Stevning, according to Wikipedia.
Along the same vein, Hans
Christian Andersen wrote a story called 'The Emperor's New Clothes' that
depicted a vain king influenced by two weavers that pretend they are weaving invisible
cloth. In the Jewish movie version of this
story by Stephen Spielberg, Yiddish phrases are used and original dialogue is
changed to depict twisted and sexually-perverted minds. Much of the voice cast is Jewish.
Why, when a wholesome story
is re-produced by Jewish people it changes, I have no idea. Why it needs to be changed is a mystery also
but it happens over and over.
The change in the true Joan
of Arc story is a prime example. Jewish
writers and producers either create far-out, violent, spaced-out, monster, magical
or sexual movies or they take time-worn stories and change them.
At the beginning of the
documentary, Leo Braudy, University
of Southern California,
states, "When the system has to change, when the social order itself is on
the verge of changing, the vehicle of that is often a woman. Because women are outside the social system: Somebody who comes out of nowhere to strike
against the corruption of power."
Sound familiar?
More can be read about Jewish
producers, actors and movers and shakers at:
http://hipsterjew.com/2012/03/atheists-use-gods-name-in-vain-anger-yaweh/
