The Prodigal Son

Why do so many people not reward the unselfish person that does the most good? The answer is 'The Prodigal Son' parable. My father never liked that story and neither do I. It rewards those that did nothing and pushes aside the person that did the most and makes them 'equal.'

First of all, I don't believe Yeshua, the Christ, ever said it. Or someone corrupted what he actually said...a person who believed the weak should be rewarded and cared for. It is a terrible story that dominates most peoples' thinking today. The strong person must be punished. The weak must be coddled and we have to pretend they deserve credit for what the faithful person did.

I see it over and over. The weak hate the strong and try to beat them down. It is easy to do now-a-days with so many bleeding heart liberals and mentally ill, sanctimonious women out there. Yes, I am a woman but I see the truth quite clearly.

Here's another one that Yeshua did not say: Exodus 21:24, 'eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.' This phrase only appears in newer translations of the Bible. The Aramaic version addresses the Beatitudes and states, '39But I am saying to you, you shall not rise up against an evil person, but whoever strikes you on your right cheek, turn to him also the other. 40And whoever wants to sue you and take your coat, leave for him also your cloak. 41Whoever compels you to go one mile with him, go with him two miles. 42Whoever asks you, give to him, and whoever wants to borrow from you, do not refuse him'  There is no mention of 'Blessed are the weak...'

It also states, '20For I say to you, that unless your goodness will exceed that of the Scribes and the Pharisees, you will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven.'

Over and over early translations of the Bible show us that Yeshua was against those Zealots in Herod's Temple...those Judeans.

Same as with Machiavelli's book, The Prince: 'It is easier to hurt a kind man because he cannot injure you.' All these things put together, the Prodigal Son, an Eye for an Eye and Machiavelli makes good men's lives miserable. And that is the way it is supposed to be, evidently.

This is as simple as I can make it...the word 'Judean' was changed to 'Jew' in the 18th century

The word 'Jew' was inserted into the Bible about the 18^th century. The 'Jew' is not who they want you to believe they are. The Jews did this to fool people into believing they are the original Israelites and 'the Chosen People.' But what they actually did was tell all of us how mean and deceptive they really are.

About eight years ago when I began my journey into 'Have Jews destroyed our nation?' there wasn't hardly any reliable information out there to answer this. The confusion for most people is that they 'think' Jews are holy people and the state of Israel belongs to them, including Jerusalem. The truth, however, is that the word 'Jew' wasn't ever in the Bible until the 18^th century. That insertion cemented their existence in the minds of English-speaking people.

The King James Authorized translation of the New Testament into English was begun in 1604 and first published in 1611. The word 'Jew' did not appear in either version. The word 'Jew' appeared in both these well-known editions in their 18^th century revised versions for the first time. “The word 'Jew' today is never regarded as a synonym for 'Judean' nor is 'Judean' regarded as a synonym for 'Jew.' “ http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jew.htm

When the word "Jew" was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century, its one and only implication, inference, and innuendo was "Judean." During the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries, a well-organized and well-financed international "pressure group" created a so-called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" among the English speaking peoples of the world and is a misrepresentation. http://stewartsynopsis.com/Isreal.htm
Anyone out there that reads or quotes the Bible, mixed up compilation that it is, must compare the Aramaic version with newer versions. Compare these two versions:

“However no man spoke openly of him for fear of the Jews.” John, 17:13, King James

“But no man spoke openly about Him, for fear of the Judeans.” John, 17:13Aramaic is a much older translation from Greek.

And the Holman Christian Standard Bible, International Standard Version, NET Bible, GOD'S WORD Translation, Jubilee Bible 2000, King James 2000 Bible, American King James Version and countless others all excluded the word 'Judean' from their books and inserted 'Jew' in those translations.

Compare also the differences between these passages:

2, Kings 16.6 At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath: and the Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day. (King James)

6 At that time, Rezin king of Aram recovered Elath for Aram by driving out the men of Judah. Edomites then moved into Elath and have lived there to this day. (Aramaic)

2nd Kings 25:25 But it came to pass in the seventh month, that Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, the son of Elishama, of the seed royal, came, and ten men with him, and smote Gedaliah, that he died, and the Jews and the Chaldees that were with him at Mizpah. (King James)

2 Kings 25.25

25 In the seventh month, however, Ishmael son of Nethaniah, the son of Elishama, who was of royal blood, came with ten men and assassinated Gedaliah and also the men of Judah and the Babylonians who were with him at Mizpah. (Aramaic)

This kind of alteration of original writings was done to make English readers believe that Jews existed during the time of the Old Testament and Christ. They had to distinguish themselves from the other Judeans who were followers of Christ and Abraham. Once they gathered enough 'influence' and money, they had the Bible changed in the 18^th century. This is a serious alteration. It takes away all the original credibility of Christ being very upset with these Judeans (that went to Babylon, the 10 Northern Tribes to Assyria) and inserts them into those roles.

In the days of His flesh few of the citizens of Judea were Judahites. Some belonged to one of the other tribes of Israel, and many were descendants of Esau (Edomites) who had assimilated and become co-religious with the Judahites and remnants of the other tribes in the hybrid religion of Pharisaism developed during the captivity in Babylon. This is the religion of the Talmud (and) is called Judaism today; it was condemned by Jesus since it is the antithesis of the Mosaic Law and the prophets makes the Word of God of no effect. Matthew 15:1-9 states such..

The issue I have with the above statement is that even Christ said there was no religion and I believe 'Pharisaism' is a recently developed word. There were 'Israelites' in Christ's time, as quoted when he met Nathanael. So, it is impossible to say Abraham was the 'first Jew.' because there were none. Hebrew was a written language for sacred books. At first the Jew spoke Yiddish, as proven when the Bolsheviks took over Mother Russia in 1917. Today any Jew will tell you he 'Is a Hebrew' and speaks Hebrew.

Jesus describes 'an Israelite' as someone who is honest. Aramaic states, “Yeshua saw Nathaniel when he came to him and said about him: “Behold, truly a son of Israel in whom is no deceit.” King James states, “Jesus saw Nathaniel coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!” Both these translations are similar but why change them at all? Because today we ARE afraid of the Jews.

I believe that the reason they inserted 'Jew' is to make people believe Jews lived in Jesus' time. There were arguments between Jesus and these 'new' Rabbis and Pharisees (Zealots) from Herod's Temple, as stated in Matthew as 'Judeans.' The mistake Jews made when taking out the word 'Judean' and inserting 'Jew' is that they have inserted the word 'Jew' onto those that were violating Temple rules not the Judeans that the people were afraid of them because if they spoke of Christ, they could not enter the Temple and some sources state these Zealots even began killing those Christ belivers. These inserters, perhaps unknowingly, made themselves the bad guys and gave them a name...Jew.  But today's 'Christians,' and even Catholics, are so scared that they will go to hell if they don't believe the Jews' story about Israel, that they won't even compare the older version of the Bible with King James.

Jews want the Bible to back up their claim that THEY were the Kingdom of Israel, which is not true, and that that claim gives them the right to stay on stolen Palestinian land. Therein lies the problem.

ALL YOU NEED IS LOVE

Since Civil Rights and the 60s Revolution, this 'love' thing is not working. In fact, nations are

many times worse because of it. Look around. The U.S. economy is in the toilet. Our morality is perverted. Men want to use the heterosexual sacrament of marriage to validate their homosexual 'deviation' and make it normal.

The experiment did not work. The only people that can control those living in the Middle East were Saddam Hussein, Muammar Qaddafi and Bin Laden...and they are all dead and it is possible Bin Laden had been dead for three years when the U.S. shoved his body out of the helicopter. These men were accused of 'human rights violations' and also having a strong dislike for the West. So the imperialistic West removed them and what happened? Those nations were destroyed, there are 'rebels' everywhere and lots of killings, all while the fiddler on the roof played his tune. Just as with the Free Republic of China, the U.S. supplied ammunition to the REDS and those free nations fell to communism. And the U.S. knew this would happen. Even the village idiot knew.

Who is causing the unrest in the Middle East? Why, of course, Israel, the U.S.'s bestest buddy and ally. Israel wants Syria's land and especially wants Iran. The only way these nations can function is under a strong dictator. Not communism....one strong man and the U.S. ruined that.

Vespasian and his son, Titus, built the Roman Collosseum to entertain the people so that they would not notice they were being taxed to death.  And they also opened bars for the people, but that got out of hand and they closed them.  Note that the same thing is happening in the U.S.  The sports stadiums and entertainment centers and large malls are owned by people with last names such as Schottenstain.

Banjamin Netanyahu is 'upset' because the U.S. is talking to Iran, if you can believe anything he says anyway. It is all scripted. Obama is proving by his actions that he wants to destroy other nations in the Middle East that Israel doesn't like. Worse fools than Obama and Netanyahu are the Americans that are afraid to say this. Remember the Oslo Talks lasted for 10 years in the 90s and the only result was the death of Yasser Arafat. The dye is cast...over and over...and 'the people' are fooled.

This 'love' ruined South Africa. Can you imagine a prosperous nation of white people, helping the Africans north of them and even those living among them, and then the anti-Apartheid movement comes in and forces that nation to let other black nations in and, of course, S.A. is a mess now. S.A. even got rid of their atomic bomb because they feared the 'new people' would blow it up. The 'new people' caused their nuclear electric grid to go down.

The dream of love is like communism. It is a dream. It ain't gonna ever work. People don't want 'love.' They want security, prosperity and industries. They want what they had before the Jewish-run Civil Rights and 60s Revolution changed our Republic. But the people followed the Jewish message, “Down with the Establishment,' not realizing our Establishment was doing pretty good. They didn't even know what 'the establishment' meant.  Just as JFK had to die to herald this 'new establishment' in, so too the state of Israel and the holocaust had to come into being to take over the Middle East.

One illegal nation is responsible for the destruction of the U.S. While people were loving it up, our infrastructure was crumbling. It took about 20 years for these Jews, aka communists, to overthrow Mother Russia. It took the same group about 20 years to plan 9-11. The U.S. has been run by the same group for over 68 years. That is not LOVE.

What IF the Romans had done for the Zealots....

What IF the Romans had done for the Zealots then what the United States is doing for the Jews today? Through Roman time, they didn't fight for any other nation and they were in complete control of their territory for over 700 years. If we compare the relatively short reign of the United States, why would they put their neck out for a chaotic group of people and why give them legitimacy?

I think the answer lies in the hatred these Zealots had for other people in Judea. Their leaders, Rabbis and Pharisees in Herod's Temple, had wormed their way into convincing the Romans they deserved land and the right to govern it. Same with the Brits, Truman and the U.N. did in 1948. Then why did the Romans finally tire of the Zealot's hatred toward non-Zealots and destroy them?

Evidently these Zealots, who now call themselves 'Jews,' formed a new ideology and peddled this ideology for thousands of years, changing the wording in the Aramaic Bible to include the word “Jew.” I am not going into the 'birthright' to Palestinian land that Jews now live on. The fact is Jews are there, stealing more land, torturing the Palestinians and taking over their religions sites and towns. I have found that one tactic Jews and psychopaths use is not listening and pounding away over and over that they are right. Most people give up. I think the Romans did for a time but they learned.

The U.S. has not learned this lesson yet. Zealots/Jews do not build anything. They take over the building (Herod's Temple) and now, thanks to the U.S., have taken over Palestinian land, including Jerusalem. Right now, Jews won't let anyone else in at the excavation site of Herod's burial. That, Jews believe, will cement the fact in history that THEY own that land.

While these Zealots were plotting for decades to find the right sucker to defend them, let us talk about what Arabs have done. According to http://www.cogwriter.com/arabprophecy.htm

“As far as greatness is concerned, throughout most of the "dark ages" in the West, the Arabic peoples were the leaders in science and culture--perhaps the greatest of all peoples at that time. The Arabs are still a major people, and have partially fulfilled this prophecy.”

“While Europe languished in the Dark Ages, Arab scholars were pioneering developments in algebra and the study of modern astronomy” (Nature magazine, March 14, 2002)

“While the rest of Europe was in the midnight of the Dark Ages, the Moorish universities of Spain were the beacon of the revival of learning. The Christian teacher was still manipulating the bones of the saints when the Arab physician was practicing surgery. The schools and monasteries in Italy, France, and Germany were still grappling with poor scholastic knowledge when Arab scholars were well advanced in the study of Aristotle and Plato. Stimulated by their acquaintance with the works of Ptolemy and Euclid, Galenus and Hippocrates, they extended their researches into the dominions of astronomy, mathematics, and medicine.” (page 7, History of Egypt from 330 B.C. to the Present Time by Angelo Solomon Rappoport, Published by Grolier Society, 1904)
“Schools and universities flourished in Moslem lands when Christian Europe was still in the “Dark Ages.”" (page 383, Early European History by Hutton Webster, Published by D.C. Heath & Co., 1917)”



Now while the Arabs were building civilizations of architecture and learning, what were 'Jews' doing? They were merchants. They went into cities like Florence (Medici family) and took control, sort of behind the backs of those living there. When that nation caught on as to what these merchants were doing, they kicked them out. Just as the Romans did in 70 A.D., the 'Jews' were dispersed around the world, taking on German and Spanish last names so they would not be noticed. But their behavior is noticed. Here is a list according to http://www.cameldog.net/war-peace/26529-list-countries-jews-have-been-kicked-out.html:



Africa (1147, 1790)
Arabia (624)
Austria (1298)
Babylon (586BC)
Bavaria (1551)
Belgium (1370)
Czechoslovokia (1745)
Denmark (not allowed in until the 17th century)
Egypt (1571BC, 38BC, 3BC, 66)
England (not allowed in until the 12th century, expelled in 1290)
France (561, 1182, 1242, 1306,1394,1540, 1682)
Germany (1012, 1096, 1146, 1298, 1510, 1614, 1935-revoked citizenship)
Hungary (1360, 1582, 1717)
Italy (1492, 1540, 1550, 1846)
Iraq (not allowed to emigrate to until 2003)
Lebanon (Jews not allowed entrance)
Palestine (70, 324)
Lithuania (1495)
Netherlands (1444)
Norway (1814)
Poland (1453, 1772-Pale of Settlement)
Portugal (1498)
Prussia (1510)
Rome (315,379)
Russia (1772-Pale of Settlement, 1881)
Saxony (1349)
Slovakia (1380, 1744)
Spain (612, 694, 1391, 1492-1968, officially)
Sweden (until 1782)
Switzerland (1939)
Syria (Jews not allowed entrance)



Can 32 nations be wrong? While Jews try and say they are the scapegoat of problems in those nations, the truth is THEY caused the problems. So, I go back to the original premise, What IF the Romans had done for the Zealots what the United States is doing for the Jews? We would have to be talking about a nation that backs these Jews. Without tremendous protection, monetary and weapontry support from that nation, the Jews would again be looking for a new place to land.



Without getting into the rise in power of Jews in the world thanks to Karl Marx and Zionism, I would like to propose a solution. Each one of us must stand up to this insanity. We have to be aggressive to the bleeding-heart Liberals out there and tell them, 'Have you gone insane?' We must be as aggressive as the enemy that has taken over our Republic. Just remind them of how our forefathers thought. Without them, we would not be living here and now that is being taken away and destroyed from within by a group of ideologists that hide behind 'religion.'



We don't have a 'Roman' government. All the people that know what is happening such as Patrick Buchanan, Ron Paul, Paul Findley and Cynthia McKinney need to be supported. Sadly, Senator Joseph McCarthy, JFK, Henry Ford and even Thomas Jefferson tried to warn us. Without these peoples' support, we are helpless to do anything except write an article here, do a radio show there and send gloom-and-doom emails.



That is it. We must support the 'Romans' of our time because we don't have good guys running this nation any longer. We have a pure Communist agenda. Kids repeat what they are being told. Forget them. Go to the people that have proved they want our Republic back. When the U.S. removes its total support for Israel, water will seek its own level and we didn't even have to kill anybody.



IN CONCLUSION: The Romans would have never relinquished any of their power to the Zealot extremists, aka Pharisees and rabbis. They gave them land and buildings to live on and a Temple, but still collected taxes from them. Then the Romans had enough of their malicious ways and banished them. The U.S. has been run by Communists, aka Jews, since WWII. Jews need a host and they finally found one that will give them anything, even at the expense of our nation.

Are you Islamic or extremest? You can't be both.

I am getting quite tired of this 'religious' mislabeling. You are either Islamic or an extremest. Islam is the religion and Muslim is a practitioner of Islam. In the Catholic Church, which developed a hundred years before Islam, they have always had excommunication for those that did not follow their laws. Evidently, Islam has no such ability.

I have not heard of Catholic Terrorists or Lutheran Terrorists because most likely, both religions would distance their name from those terrorist groups. But not Islam. They have Sunnis and Shiites that have been fighting since the 7^th century, Sunnis being the majority. That is a recipe for disaster. The Catholic Church was created by Constantine in the 4^th century and came long before Lutherans, Baptists or say, Quakers. Only Lutherans broke from the Catholic Church but they are separate. I say there should be a Sunni religion and a Shiite religion that are separate, but believe in, basically, the same things with their own exceptions.  As long as the cat's tails are tied together, they always will be fighting.

In any group, they must have common laws and beliefs. The Church does and they don't have anything within it like the Sunnis or Shiites. If you don't believe the same things, such as Martin Luther had issue with, they should separate. And Islam respects what Catholics believe. Jews could have just as well adopted Islam because they all lived in the same area and practiced the same traditions.  But the Romans kicked the Zealots out of Herod's Temple and then from the whole area so, the Zealots were ticked.  

It is strange that Islam and Catholic are close in beliefs and they get along...separately.  Judaism 'believes' in the same beliefs also but with a twist:  Judaism is all about making Jews 'The Chosen People.'  To make them legit.  Their message is pure propaganda and their hearts are filled with hate towards those that do not like their behavior and anyone not Jewish.  They will never separate and that makes them powerful.   Finally, with a big brother like the United States, they are getting what their mantra states.

And if they can't do that, at least DENY THAT A TERRORIST IS ISLAMIC. Excommunicate them. Distance yourself. You're putting any true Muslim into the same class as idiots. Judaism has different sects of Jews in it but they are ALL united.  An Israeli terrorists is a Jewish terrorist.  Same thing.

Muslims have to stop fighting among themselves or they will never get their land back that the Jews stole. ISIS is supposed to be an 'Islamic extremest' group but they go against what good Islam stands for. They are not Muslims! They are extremest...beyond the pale.  They are killing Muslims and Christians, not Jews. That doesn't make sense.

OPEN LETTER TO DR. PHIL

I sent Dr. Phil an email about a guest that would present factual evidence about Jews and the holocaust.  Instead of sending the following letter to him, I decided you should read it.  At least I will know intelligent life read it.

 

Dr. Phil,

I watched your show on March 17, 2015, about the man who didn't like race mixing (only because my neighbor called me to turn it on) and thought Jews were beasts.  You are one step above Jerry Springer.

I stopped watching your show long ago because of your sensational technique of picking the strangest people and if you don't agree with a person, you brutally tear him down so that the audience will be influenced. That is a propaganda interview.

Now, the person reading this is probably saying 'better not read this rest of this email' because it could hurt Dr. Phil's ego, but read on. I am not nor ever been a 'racist.' That idea came about because Jews introduced the words 'black, racist, anti-semitic and bi-polar' to make Americans they THEY are the problem. Read Jewish professor Robert Weissberg's paper entitled, 'Jews and blacks. Everything the goyim wanted to know but were afraid to ask.' He disparages the American black by writing books about how stupid they are. He admits Jews used blacks for desegregation and Civil Rights. He told me, “The blacks don't appreciate what Jews have done for them.”

You don't do enough research. You are one-sided just like Lexus Nexus and their case laws. You are making people believe in the 'sound bite mentality,' first mentioned by John Stossel. That means they think 'it just happened' instead of researching for the CAUSE. It's the cause, boss, the cause.

Let me go over some things you said during this show:

1. That one 'expert' man on a TV monitor was saying the man's daughter was messed up (with a black child) because he wasn't home. Gee, he was in prison! The man admitted his daughter was messed up! The father missed that one.

2. So, if dad caused his daughter to have a black child and at the end, Dr. Phil is telling the girl to call her father a “Beast,” how is that any different from the father calling Jews and blacks “Beasts.” Well, because Dr. PHIL said it. The street doesn't run both ways on your show, does it? And then you told the daughter that got messed up because dad wasn't there that she had to 'stay away from your father' and keep that baby away from him too.

I'm not talking about 'racism' here. I'm talking about listening exactly to what is said and being an impartial interviewer.

I was a police officer for 16 years, although I never talked about politics on the job. My job was protecting and saving no matter who they were. I have a B.A. in Political Science, summa cum laude. I studied hard and for three years had fair and conservative professors. But the last year I had to take elective classes with the traditional students and ran into the Liberal professors. Stark contrast. My adviser was Jewish and so was one of those fair professors but they were in the minority. When Jews and Liberals get to be the majority, they get mean and lower your grade if you don't agree with them. Law school is brutal because of this Liberalism.

Compare Pixar movies before January, 2006 with those afterward. Check out Senator Joseph McCarthy's book, America's retreat from Victory. He banned Jewish movie directors from making subversive movies until 1965. Check out what happened to movies after that, and TV shows, and video games, and clothing, and music. Think that is just a coincidence? No, it is a Changing Of The Guard.

That father had the right to say what he did and you had the right to fairly interview him and not make fun of him. Did you see the daughter's face when she didn't know the camera was on her? She pouted and shook her head in a baby way and then saw she was on camera, saw the camera and had an 'Oops” look. I give your cameramen credit for that snippet.

Now, I could be wrong. It could be that you know what is going on and put this father on so he could get his message out. You just pretended to be egotistical and judgmental. Could be. But from what I saw, you were trying to diminish his message and make people think the father was wrong and to hate him. That is coercion.

 .

It doesn't really matter if you find out the truth. Those Jews will destroy you just like they are going to destroy this father. They will either ruin his income, have him killed, shoot through his window, encourage others to burn down his house or the ATF will visit his house and find 'something.' Hopefully they didn't plant it there in the first place, but don't count on it.

At my department black officers had a web site called The Shield or something. Only blacks could join but not the ones we liked or trusted. These were the disgruntled ones, the ones that think they aren't liked 'just because we're black.' But if white officers had an white-only web site, well, that would be racist. That is why Vatican II made the Church secular. That is why Jews say the Masonic Temple has a degree above 32^nd. There is no 33 degree. The Masonic Temple's 'crime' was not letting in Jews, women and blacks. As a woman, I have no problem with that. Men like to be in groups sometimes.

These Jews have separated Americans into 'black and white.' The people were fixing the mess Civil Rights created and Jews can't have that. Hence Ferguson, MO. Make people think there IS a racist problem in policing. Heck, they own the newspapers and TV stations. They must bring 'racism' back into the limelight and make people believe it exists.

You could be such a savior of this Republic (not a democracy) if you were impartial. However, you are just like the rest...sensational.

Hey, thanks to whoever read this. I hope more people will actually LISTEN to what is said and not jumble it up in their dyslexic brain and 'assume' they meant something else and hurl it out of their mouth as something that wasn't said in the first place.

HERE'S A FACT FOR THE RECORD...CENSORSHIP

I just heard on the news that this was the warmest winter on record...ever:

http://www.aol.com/article/2015/03/19/earth-records-its-warmest-winter-on-record/21155340/?icid=maing-grid7

|main5|dl3|sec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D630263

But more importantly than this is that The Weather Channel wants to shut down these anti-global warming proponents. And a man named Coleman said Climate Change is a myth and he said that on FOX.

Paige Lavender stated that news outlets are being told to limit their information against climate change proponents because it is not backed by facts. They also said something about people think presenting both sides is a good thing but they should not be allowed to state what is it not factual.

 

Now, I don't know about you but the holocaust isn't factual either and Jews won't let 'the other side,' which happens to be factual, the right to talk about. I read last year about a school teacher that gave an assignment to his students about 'Did the holocaust really happen?' But the school prevented him from doing this. I wrote to the teacher.

Can you tell me when Americans will wake up to the FACT that they are being censored? And not only censored but put into a narrow box that limits what they are allowed to think about.

I'll tell you who censors and intimidates—Dr. Phil. Read my following article on this arrogant guy.